🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard females from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The final authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable debates in additional EU countries